Author Topic: The Road to the White House 2016  (Read 18528 times)

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #465 on: August 10, 2017, 03:15:51 PM »
No, I don't doubt people, left and right, are vulnerable to scare-mongering and other campaign tactics which appeal to the emotions. Soss and DSC though, are inferring that all the Brexit voters were a bunch of knuckle-dragging xenophobes who picked up The Sun and went: "Oh god, the Poles are eating our cats."

I do have my concerns about Brexit, especially regarding economic matters, which I'm not well versed in (righties would say my fears are misplaced, it's just left-wing scare-mongering). However, plenty of intelligent people had there reasons for voting leave and it's simplistic and arrogant to take the attitude of ' They were all duped because they couldn't see through the bullshit like I can'.

And just for clarification... I wasn't electoral register at the time and didn't vote. A lack of VPN also meant I wasn't made privy to the full extent of the debate until after the vote was made. It would've been a tough decision for me.

You're talking s***, I never described anyone as anything similar to the words you used. Please don't misquote me if you're going to use my username & apparent opinion to form your post, I don't appreciate that.
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.


Offline uglyAmerican619

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 7455
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #466 on: August 10, 2017, 05:45:18 PM »
Soss we need to look on the bright side like our friend, young master DSC would. Take this whole North Korea thing popping off right when we have a melting carrot with his finger on the button. The upside?

I give you the Nuclear Winter Olympics :thumbs:
One if by land, two if by sea....

Offline AceLV74EVA

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 13683
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #467 on: August 10, 2017, 06:04:01 PM »
No, I don't doubt people, left and right, are vulnerable to scare-mongering and other campaign tactics which appeal to the emotions. Soss and DSC though, are inferring that all the Brexit voters were a bunch of knuckle-dragging xenophobes who picked up The Sun and went: "Oh god, the Poles are eating our cats."

I do have my concerns about Brexit, especially regarding economic matters, which I'm not well versed in (righties would say my fears are misplaced, it's just left-wing scare-mongering). However, plenty of intelligent people had there reasons for voting leave and it's simplistic and arrogant to take the attitude of ' They were all duped because they couldn't see through the bullshit like I can'.

And just for clarification... I wasn't electoral register at the time and didn't vote. A lack of VPN also meant I wasn't made privy to the full extent of the debate until after the vote was made. It would've been a tough decision for me.

Some fair points there, personally I think one of the issues of contention is that when something is said both sides seem to think they are saying it about everyone. Were some on the right wooed by the media s*** storm and scare tactics? Yes Were all of them? No Are some of the left as intolerant as fascists? Yes Are all of them ? No

I think its like the defence of Islam over Terrorism, All Muslims aren't terrorists but because of that should we not do anything about those that are?
Bob is to blame

114


Offline sossujrurl

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 8131
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #468 on: August 11, 2017, 09:04:04 AM »
Soss we need to look on the bright side like our friend, young master DSC would. Take this whole North Korea thing popping off right when we have a melting carrot with his finger on the button. The upside?

I give you the Nuclear Winter Olympics :thumbs:

It would be interesting to see how the Brexiters would react if WWIII stopped Brexit. Who could they blame?
Forcing stupidity on internets since 1991

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #469 on: August 11, 2017, 12:29:01 PM »
I "Soss and DSC", and Soss did call the Brexit voting electorate a bunch of f***ing idiots or something, and both of you said it's because people are scared of foreigners.

I'll be careful next time not to lump you in with nasty pasty Soss.

Just not sure why you used my username in a post when I explicitly said the opposite to what you claimed I had said. Unless you can show me where I said Brexit voters are knuckle-draggers? Very odd for you to claim I said so giving the nature of my initial post. Maybe you want me to have that opinion to suit your narrative? I don't know, but please don't misquote me in the future, especially when the topic is regarding my perceptions of other people.
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.


Offline sossujrurl

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 8131
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #470 on: August 11, 2017, 12:34:07 PM »
Soss did call the Brexit voting electorate a bunch of f***ing idiots or something,

That's because they are.


FACT.
Forcing stupidity on internets since 1991

Offline TK

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #471 on: August 11, 2017, 01:28:22 PM »
That's because they are.


FACT.

In some cases, not in all....

There were people voting for both leave AND remain for equally stupid reasons and they're equally f***ing idiots.


This kind of sweeping, blanket statement makes you look like the stereotypical "remoaner" who is so emotionally incapable of accepting the result that they'll unthinkingly use whatever ridiculous line of attack pops into their heads - if you want to paint yourself as the smart one (which you seemingly constantly like to do) then you might want to avoid being one of those:
 
Pant pissing f***ing imbeciles who cannot think for themselves

Offline sossujrurl

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 8131
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #472 on: August 11, 2017, 02:21:22 PM »
It's the only way I get responses. Carrying out research and presenting the results in a reasoned manner gets ignored. Chucking insults about and ending spurious claims with "FACT" seems to elicit more discussion.

I just wonder given the knowledge people have now, the no plan negotiations and a taste of the long term consequences, would the country still vote to leave?
Forcing stupidity on internets since 1991

Offline TK

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #473 on: August 11, 2017, 02:40:20 PM »
I just wonder given the knowledge people have now, the no plan negotiations and a taste of the long term consequences, would the country still vote to leave?

I don't think either of us can answer that....

It's an interesting thought though - on the one hand, nothing you've just mentioned impacts on the strongest arguments for leaving (generally coming under the sovereignty umbrella, including the ability to control all aspects of immigration - regardless of the fact that neither of our major parties are currently any better than the EU itself anyway) and I'm sure the mistrust of the EU's constant drive towards further integration will have been further strengthened by their behaviour during the talks (even though it's been every bit as predictable as ours - both sides set unachievable high targets and plan to be worked down to meet in the middle, classic negotations).


Plus, the factors you've mentioned might tip the balance for people who see strong arguments on both sides - for me, it came down to short-to-medium-term economics vs sovereignty and the possibility for future governments (ie: not our current incompetents and not the even-less-competents opposite) to set us on better paths than the ones we've been on...
It wasn't the best time to be leaving, which counted against it too - but then the long period of time between such votes meant that significant damage could've been done by the time we got another chance to vote on it.


I guess you just can't please everyone...
Had we not voted leave, the Tories wouldn't have called that snap election and then proceeded to screw themselves, creating the illusion that Corbyn is actually somewhat popular (when really, he's just less unpopular by comparison than he should be) - so from the point of view of someone on the far-left, maybe Brexit is a good thing in the short-term because it gives them more time in the political limelight. :lol:

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #474 on: August 11, 2017, 03:11:37 PM »
I wrote "Soss and DSC" because you're both, broadly speaking, making similar arguments. But no, you didn't call Brexit voters nasty names, that was just Soss. You took the more patronising angle of "they're misled, I'm not".

I apologise for tarring you with the Soss brush, Again, I'll be careful not to lump you together with him in future.

No, you have perceived that I was being patronising as I all you have is words on a screen to make a judgement, that's fine - but if we were in the same room you would know there's nothing patronising about what I said, empathetic would be much closer to the feeling.

No problem with being lumped in with Soss, one of the most interesting thoughtful posters on here. Maybe address each post/situation as they arise rather than making sweeping statements and categorising how you will respond the future. It's not that smart.
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.

Offline sossujrurl

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 8131
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #475 on: August 11, 2017, 05:32:54 PM »
I don't think either of us can answer that....

It's an interesting thought though - on the one hand, nothing you've just mentioned impacts on the strongest arguments for leaving (generally coming under the sovereignty umbrella, including the ability to control all aspects of immigration - regardless of the fact that neither of our major parties are currently any better than the EU itself anyway) and I'm sure the mistrust of the EU's constant drive towards further integration will have been further strengthened by their behaviour during the talks (even though it's been every bit as predictable as ours - both sides set unachievable high targets and plan to be worked down to meet in the middle, classic negotations).


Plus, the factors you've mentioned might tip the balance for people who see strong arguments on both sides - for me, it came down to short-to-medium-term economics vs sovereignty and the possibility for future governments (ie: not our current incompetents and not the even-less-competents opposite) to set us on better paths than the ones we've been on...
It wasn't the best time to be leaving, which counted against it too - but then the long period of time between such votes meant that significant damage could've been done by the time we got another chance to vote on it.


I guess you just can't please everyone...
Had we not voted leave, the Tories wouldn't have called that snap election and then proceeded to screw themselves, creating the illusion that Corbyn is actually somewhat popular (when really, he's just less unpopular by comparison than he should be) - so from the point of view of someone on the far-left, maybe Brexit is a good thing in the short-term because it gives them more time in the political limelight. :lol:

I dispute quite a lot what you say. It's just your opinion that the opposition is less competent. It is my opinion that Labour would make a much better country except for those who think that it's OK to live in a country where wealthy individuals and large corporations get tax breaks and children live in poverty. They might be slightly worse off but still far wealthier than the rest of us.

We have always been in control of immigration. First from outside the EU we can decide who comes in Visa free and who doesn't. And then from within the EU freedom of movement only covers visits of up to 3 months. If someone can't demonstrate financial independence after this time then they can be removed. Our government decided not to implement this, mainly because it would cost too much to implement.

When Poland, Latvia, etc first joined the EU work permits were required (the same as any accession state) for the first two years. Our government decided to open the borders on a request from industry. Again we decided not to control migration.

More recently the EU allowed us special security measures: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/521926/The_UK_s_cooperation_with_the_EU_on_justice_and_home_affairs__and_on_foreign_policy_and_security_issues.pdf

Particularly interesting is 1.6 and 1.7


We have been in control of immigration all of this time. Neoliberalist capitalism decided that cheap labour from former Soviet bloc states was more important than proper immigration controls. It wasn't the EU it was greed.

What else? Oh yeah, sovereignty. The ability to govern oneself?

In 2001 we passed this law:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/william-hague/8642073/Now-you-have-power-to-veto-EU-changes-in-referendum.html

Forcing stupidity on internets since 1991

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #476 on: August 12, 2017, 01:54:59 PM »
Again, I will. And my apology from the previous post still stands.

Off topic slightly though, why are you so convinced that it's others who are misled? "Perception" and "Dysfunction" are your go-to words in most discussions, with the implication that you are able to perceive what others cannot, as if you've reached a higher plain of existence or something.

Again, you're imposing your own meaning onto what I say. I claim to be above nobody, yet you've based your post around the idea that I do. You are incorrect. As far as what you said prior goes, I use the words dysfunction and perception a lot as I know and feel through experience that our natural state as human beings in one of love. To be moved away from that loving awareness to a state of fear, anger and suffering is to perceive yourself and the world around you in a dysfunctional way. Simple as that, no judgement attached - whether you choose to keep seeing it that way is entirely up to you and nothing to do with me.

This dialogue with you has shown me that people will see what they want to see or read what they want to read... especially over the internet where there's no non-verbal communication in play. I feel what you think I say is entirely an internal reflection of yourself.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2017, 01:57:21 PM by DontSellCabaye »
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #477 on: August 13, 2017, 12:20:00 PM »


Including our simian ancestors, we've lived tribally - suspiciously, jealously, fearfully - for hundreds of thousands of years. Love, hate, fear and anger were all necessary to the success of human evolution and if you were to any one of them away we likely wouldn't have made it as a species.

Of course, this is not to say that we can't or shouldn't use our intellect to suppress certain evolutionary impulses  - we do this in many ways already. But to suggest that love is our "natural state", and that any deviation from this is a marker of dysfunction, is not congruent with science.





We have more potential as living beings than to just merely survive. I agree fear probably helped us survive at one point, however we have now become possessed by fear, possessed by ego and have fallen into an illusion of separateness to the point where it is dysfunctional. The fear is no longer serving us. Why do so many die of starvation and whilst others die of obesity at the same time? It's because of the dysfunction, the thing that makes a man feel so attached to this physical form and so detached from his loving nature of pure awareness before thought, judgement or interpretation, that he believes accumulating physical wealth and material is so important that it is actually life or death and he would be willing to see others suffer in exchange for it. That is dysfunctional. Unless of course you believe we are all merely individuals travelling through this world alone? Then it's probably fine.
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.

Offline Deffy.

  • Global Moderator
  • Forum member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6653
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #478 on: August 13, 2017, 12:32:45 PM »
But we are individuals. We are born alone, we die alone. Without the ability to link with others we are alone in our own skulls. We can form attatchments as we journey through life but ultimately we are alone.

Offline DontSellCabaye

  • Forum member
  • Posts: 5141
Re: The Road to the White House 2016
« Reply #479 on: August 13, 2017, 06:14:47 PM »

However, I do actually share many of your ideals - a world undivided by borders and nationalist sentiment would be beautiful - I just don't think revolution or break-neck-speed change will get us there. We'd need first a much more enlightened and educated population. A population living for today(a ha haa aaa) and not for rewards in the afterlife. Unltimately, we'd need something a approaching a homegenised cultre of tolerance and liberalism, but we have to start laying the foundations more diligently.



I agree with all of that and very well said too. Although a lot of religious people I know live more presently and fully than most others, I totally agree with the sentiment you're getting at - just saying as I don't like to see or paint religion negatively as too much of my immediate experience with it (actually being in contact/conversation with people and not just reading s*** online) has been beautiful and inspiring.

I do also feel, when it comes to it, we won't have much say in how break-neck-in-speed change may happen. Sometimes change must happen, we literally threaten our very existence, it's becoming a cse of evolve or die. Collectively too, individuals and communities are already breaking out and paving a better way of their own, but a greater demand on the collective to shift is only round the corner in my opinion.
Most people gaze neither into the past nor the future; they explore neither truth nor lies. They gaze at the television.